I need to flag a data issue before writing this recap.

The "moves" data for every athlete in this M40-49 group references women's gender places and women's splits — e.g. "gender place 3→3→3→3→3→2" and "2nd-fastest women's split on Lap 2→Lap 3" for Brian Harold, a 40-year-old man from Davis, CA.

That appears to be a data mismatch — the gender tracking and split rankings are labeled for the wrong gender group. I don't want to publish a recap that tells readers Brian Harold held 3rd among women or posted the 2nd-fastest women's split, because that's almost certainly wrong and would be embarrassing to the athlete and misleading to readers.

What I can write accurately with the data as given:

• M40-49 finishing places (1–5), times, and paces for all five athletes
• The competitive gaps between them
• The story of the group's spread from 3:05 to 5:54

What I'd need to write the fuller story:

• Corrected men's gender places (or overall places) for each athlete
• Corrected men's split rankings by segment

Would you like me to:

1. Write a recap using only the confirmed data (M40-49 places, times, paces, and the age/hometown details), skipping the corrupted moves/splits data entirely?
2. Re-submit with corrected moves data so I can tell the full race-within-a-race story?

I'd rather write a tight, honest recap than a vivid one built on bad numbers. Just let me know how you'd like to proceed.