I need to flag a data issue before writing this recap.

The payload contains an internal inconsistency that would cause me to fabricate or mislead if I ignored it:

• The division is labeled NB20-29 (a non-binary division, based on the naming convention).
• However, every athlete's movement note references "gender place" using "women's split" labels — which does not match a non-binary division.
• Additionally, the "moves" data references "women's split" for Samuel Goldberg (male, age 21) and Kenji Chang (male, age 28), which is inconsistent with their names and ages.

Rather than guess at what the correct gender/division labels should be, or write a recap that silently embeds contradictory data (e.g., calling male athletes' splits "women's splits"), I want to flag this for correction.

To write an accurate recap, could you clarify:

1. Is NB20-29 a non-binary division, or is this a labeling error (e.g., should it be M20-29 or W20-29)?
2. Should the "women's split" references in the moves data be "men's splits," "non-binary splits," or something else?
3. Are Samuel Goldberg and Kenji Chang correctly placed in this division?

Once those are resolved, I'll write the full recap immediately. I'd rather ask than publish something that misrepresents any athlete.