I need to flag a data quality issue before writing this recap.

The "moves" data for every finisher in this group references women's split rankings (e.g., "3rd-fastest women's split", "gender place 2→5→5…") and women's gender standings throughout. These are men in the M30-39 age group — the splits and positional tracking should reflect men's or overall standings, not women's. This appears to be a data mapping error in the payload.

I won't fabricate corrected standings, and I won't write a recap that tells readers Victor Skorapa held a top-3 women's split or tracked through the women's field — that would be factually wrong and confusing to the athletes and fans reading it.

What I can write with confidence:

• The four finishers, their finishing order, total times, and average paces
• The gaps between them
• Basic narrative around those clean facts

Would you like me to:

1. Proceed with a recap using only the clean data (names, times, paces, gaps, ages) and omit the corrupted split/positional data entirely?
2. Hold off while you pull corrected split data for this group?

Option 1 will still produce a solid, honest recap — the time gaps here tell a real story (a close battle up front, then a significant spread). Just let me know how you'd like to proceed.